Following a year as Vice President of the Conference of California Public Utility Counsel, Brian T. Cragg has been elected to serve as CCPUC President for 2012.
He follows in the footsteps of firm partners Thomas J. MacBride and Michael B. Day, who both served as President of CCPUC. Thomas MacBride is the only person to have been elected to the position twice. Continue reading “Brian Cragg carries on Goodin MacBride’s Tradition of Leadership in the Regulatory Bar”
The American College of Trial Lawyers, one of America’s premier legal associations, has inducted Goodin MacBride partner Wayne Lamprey as a Fellow.
Mr. Lamprey’s selection was based on his entire record as a trial lawyer, including several notable trials on behalf of whistleblower clients or involving claims under the False Claims Act. Continue reading “Induction of a New Fellow to American College of Trial Lawyers”
Our first two posts regarding SB 1161 provided a brief summary of the regulatory background and history relating to regulation of VoIP and other IP-enabled services by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). As readers will recall, the CPUC has yet to determine whether VoIP services are “telephone corporations” subject to its jurisdiction, but we believe the Public Utilities Code could be construed to permit regulation of VoIP and have noted that the CPUC currently regulates, as a matter of course, providers of other types of IP-enabled services. In addition, while the FCC has preempted state regulation of some forms of VoIP, it appears that fixed (non-nomadic) intrastate VoIP service may be susceptible to state regulation. Continue reading “What will be the likely impacts of SB 1161?”
In our first post regarding SB 1161, which would prohibit, subject to certain exceptions, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and other state and local agencies from regulating VoIP and other IP-enabled services, we offered some insights and historical background regarding the status of the CPUC’s jurisdiction over those services under California law. As we explained in that post, our view is that, as a matter of California law, providers of VoIP and other IP-enabled telecommunications providers are probably subject to, or potentially subject to, regulation by the CPUC as public utility telephone corporations. We did not address, however, the extent to which the CPUC’s authority may have been expressly preempted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in its 2004 Minnesota Vonage Preemption Order. We will take a look at that issue, now. Continue reading “Effect of the FCC’s Minnesota Vonage Preemption Order on CPUC Regulation of Intrastate IP-enabled Services”